Leadership As A Democratic Style Works Best - 2603 Words

The overall conclusion we can draw from research on forms of leadership is that a democratic style works best. Explain and evaluate this claim with reference to social psychological theory and evidence. Leadership can be understood as the process of having an individual member of the highest rank within a group lead its members, or is given the ability to do so. In applied social psychology, leadership can split and tied into occupational and political settings, nonetheless some educational applications of leadership in teachers has likewise been proposed (Karnes D’ilio, 1990). In addition, leadership has also been subdivided into leadership emergence and its effectiveness (Lord et al. 1986). For the purpose of this document leadership†¦show more content†¦Extraversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness neuroticism and openness, or the big five factors of personality model (Costa McCrae, 1992) in a factor analysis have been found to correlate with leadership in individuals significantly (Judge et al., 2002), thus allowing more credibility to leadership trait theory. Consequently, It is accepted that the five factor personality dimensions are the best predictors for effective leaderships that succeed in positive outcomes for the general public or company; this can be interpreted in terms of leadership emergence, effectiveness and promotion (Zaccaro, Kemp Bader, 2004). Within leaderships across countries worldwide in the political context, different directors that may share traits of personality or may fall under the great person theory don’t always manage in similar ways, hence different types of leadership such as the democratic leadership. This document will offer different social psychological research in order to explain how the statement that a democratic form of leadership works best is true. Nevertheless, this document will also state evidence to support that a democratic form of leadership may not always work best, such as when its not required, or when members have low abilities and low administrative qualities or not have one factor from the five factors of personality model (Hollis, 2014). Leadership styles such as revised i n past psychological exploration in the